alltatup
New member
OldManGrower So true. But still, I wanna be able to say, "27% THC"--just once in my life...
GrowWeedEasy.com
You're browsing as a guest. Sign up to join the conversation, share your grows, and get help from thousands of fellow growers — it's free and takes less than a minute.
My new thc potency tester
- Thread starter alltatup
- Start date
Gingerbeard
New member
alltatup I don't know how to edit all that quote crap.
You mentioned how a company is able to afford to put a ten year warranty on a product. This is from schoolin', not generalizations. The ratio of people who actually return a product, especially through the mail, is low, compared to the number of sales a company makes. It looks good for the brand and doesn't cost much. This is a generalization. People who smoke reefer are less likely than the average non-reefer smoking person to return something, even to a store. When an online or TV ad offers a money back guarantee, there are still costs and junk you don't get back that still make the company money. And you'll probably wind up paying the return shipping. I am SO not talking about you, my crunch-n-munch peanut.
Want to avoid 'restocking' fees? Find the item you want to buy and take it out in the store. Don't rely on floor models. Plug it in or ride it around. Check things out. If someone gives you a hassle you can explain that you can open the box in the store and check it out, or, you can go home, ruin the packaging, try the thing out, be unhappy, return it to the store, go home, and write a bad review about the product, the store, and the store person you are explaining the situation to, should the product not be what you were looking for. Same with food. Open, sample, buy or replace. Those Wal-Mart chef folk are there to fill people up and distract them from opening food packages in the store. It's true! Or maybe not. Next time you're in Safeway, go make yourself a sandwich with a new brand of mustard. Go by the salad bar and make yourself a Cesar to make sure the croutons are crunchy. Just to check things out. None of this is recommended in a gun shop.
Being said, if that thcometer works, I'm gonna get me one. But something that does shatter and wax as well.
You mentioned how a company is able to afford to put a ten year warranty on a product. This is from schoolin', not generalizations. The ratio of people who actually return a product, especially through the mail, is low, compared to the number of sales a company makes. It looks good for the brand and doesn't cost much. This is a generalization. People who smoke reefer are less likely than the average non-reefer smoking person to return something, even to a store. When an online or TV ad offers a money back guarantee, there are still costs and junk you don't get back that still make the company money. And you'll probably wind up paying the return shipping. I am SO not talking about you, my crunch-n-munch peanut.
Want to avoid 'restocking' fees? Find the item you want to buy and take it out in the store. Don't rely on floor models. Plug it in or ride it around. Check things out. If someone gives you a hassle you can explain that you can open the box in the store and check it out, or, you can go home, ruin the packaging, try the thing out, be unhappy, return it to the store, go home, and write a bad review about the product, the store, and the store person you are explaining the situation to, should the product not be what you were looking for. Same with food. Open, sample, buy or replace. Those Wal-Mart chef folk are there to fill people up and distract them from opening food packages in the store. It's true! Or maybe not. Next time you're in Safeway, go make yourself a sandwich with a new brand of mustard. Go by the salad bar and make yourself a Cesar to make sure the croutons are crunchy. Just to check things out. None of this is recommended in a gun shop.
Being said, if that thcometer works, I'm gonna get me one. But something that does shatter and wax as well.
CaptainWiese91
New member
Me too 🤔🤔
SoOrbudgal
New member
SoOrbudgal
New member
Whoaaa big fella that crunch-n-munch is a rip off hardly any peanuts like cracker jack man that use to be filled with peanuts.
Gingerbeard
New member
Huh? What? Did I say all that? Someone must have been egging me on. Well, take from it what you can. Maybe it's the last sentence that wraps it up all nice.
Gingerbeard
New member
I don't have a cell phone. Only a land line.
alltatup
New member
SoOrbudgal Or not enough?
SoOrbudgal
New member
We still have a land line. Comes in handy 
except price is going higher than a cat's ass.
except price is going higher than a cat's ass.
Gingerbeard
New member
Something's wrong with my brain. I had an image of a cat with a joint stuck up it's ass.
Smart phones are for drones. How the hell did so many of my generation fall into the 'connect or shrivel up and die' mentality? No. I'm done. That's all.
Smart phones are for drones. How the hell did so many of my generation fall into the 'connect or shrivel up and die' mentality? No. I'm done. That's all.
johnb1963
New member
mixed reviews on Amazon, only 58% gave 5 stars, 13% 1 star. $67, free shipping, next day in my area.
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2020
Anyone using this product should have there stoner privileges revoked.
175 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Skrustikdriver
1.0 out of 5 stars It's a SCAM!
Reviewed in the United States on March 26, 2021Verified Purchase
Its a scam spend money on useless toy with a scan to buy an app for $79 per month and its a 1 to 5 star report that feels like it asks for more info than it gives. SCAM!
75 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Kyle Ryder
1.0 out of 5 stars Don’t buy this
Reviewed in the United States on October 20, 2020Verified PurchaseEarly Reviewer Rewards(What's this?)
I don’t like the fact that they don’t say you can’t use this unless you live in a state that it’s Rec for pot to grow and that there percent is not true
72 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
James
1.0 out of 5 stars Don't waste money beware
Reviewed in the United States on February 20, 2021Verified Purchase
This product is garbage save you're money seriously
62 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
shachar sharon
5.0 out of 5 stars Best kit for home bud analysis
Reviewed in the United States on November 17, 2020Verified Purchase
The app is amazing and really accurate. The hardware is small but luxury looking and durable. Works with iPhone and galaxy s20 (but you will need to take the photos without the app and upload them to the app)
14 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
zach stoller
1.0 out of 5 stars Total trash.. not accurate or even close.. compared actual test results... This device is +50% off.
Reviewed in the United States on March 7, 2021Verified Purchase
Total trash.. not accurate or even close.. compared actual test results... This device is +50% off.
48 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Will Taylor
5.0 out of 5 stars Works as advertised
Reviewed in the United States on October 23, 2020Verified Purchase
Surprised by how accurate and useful this little guy is. We got lab results back and they were spot on with what we got using the app. Also super helpful to gets heads up with other pests out in the garden. I don't even bother with a microscope any more.
Seems like it would also be essential tool for buyers who need to be certain about what they are getting. Highly recommended, this is one piece of tech that I'll be using for years.
14 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Sharon
5.0 out of 5 stars Keep it clean with every use
Reviewed in the United States on October 17, 2020Verified PurchaseEarly Reviewer Rewards(What's this?)
Very clear images when harvesting. Great little gadget
12 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
See all reviews
Top reviews from other countries
Translate all reviews to English
Yves st pierre
5.0 out of 5 stars efficacité
Reviewed in Canada on August 24, 2021Verified Purchase
excellent merci!!
One person found this helpful
Report abuse Translate review to English
See all reviews
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2020
Anyone using this product should have there stoner privileges revoked.
175 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Skrustikdriver
1.0 out of 5 stars It's a SCAM!
Reviewed in the United States on March 26, 2021Verified Purchase
Its a scam spend money on useless toy with a scan to buy an app for $79 per month and its a 1 to 5 star report that feels like it asks for more info than it gives. SCAM!
75 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Kyle Ryder
1.0 out of 5 stars Don’t buy this
Reviewed in the United States on October 20, 2020Verified PurchaseEarly Reviewer Rewards(What's this?)
I don’t like the fact that they don’t say you can’t use this unless you live in a state that it’s Rec for pot to grow and that there percent is not true
72 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
James
1.0 out of 5 stars Don't waste money beware
Reviewed in the United States on February 20, 2021Verified Purchase
This product is garbage save you're money seriously
62 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
shachar sharon
5.0 out of 5 stars Best kit for home bud analysis
Reviewed in the United States on November 17, 2020Verified Purchase
The app is amazing and really accurate. The hardware is small but luxury looking and durable. Works with iPhone and galaxy s20 (but you will need to take the photos without the app and upload them to the app)
14 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
zach stoller
1.0 out of 5 stars Total trash.. not accurate or even close.. compared actual test results... This device is +50% off.
Reviewed in the United States on March 7, 2021Verified Purchase
Total trash.. not accurate or even close.. compared actual test results... This device is +50% off.
48 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Will Taylor
5.0 out of 5 stars Works as advertised
Reviewed in the United States on October 23, 2020Verified Purchase
Surprised by how accurate and useful this little guy is. We got lab results back and they were spot on with what we got using the app. Also super helpful to gets heads up with other pests out in the garden. I don't even bother with a microscope any more.
Seems like it would also be essential tool for buyers who need to be certain about what they are getting. Highly recommended, this is one piece of tech that I'll be using for years.
14 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
Sharon
5.0 out of 5 stars Keep it clean with every use
Reviewed in the United States on October 17, 2020Verified PurchaseEarly Reviewer Rewards(What's this?)
Very clear images when harvesting. Great little gadget
12 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
See all reviews
Top reviews from other countries
Translate all reviews to English
Yves st pierre
5.0 out of 5 stars efficacité
Reviewed in Canada on August 24, 2021Verified Purchase
excellent merci!!
One person found this helpful
Report abuse Translate review to English
See all reviews
SoOrbudgal
New member
WTF????
G
Guest
Guest
Trying to figure out how this gadget works.
It is based on a camera accessory (HiGrade Scope, a kind of camera loupe) that you attach to your iPhone or Android.
You take a picture which is then uploaded to a service that analyzes the picture with an algorithm based on other pictures uploaded by other users, pictures which are archived somewhere.
An image taken with a digital camera is based on pixels, rectangular or square, resolution, and color, RGB, CMYK.
So, I did some research, and... when things seem too good to be true, they probably are...
Until I see an independent testing lab do a comparison test of the same marijuana plant, I remain skeptical. (I was born skeptical.)
Just my my 2¢...
There are 483 identifiable chemical constituents known to exist in the cannabis plant, and at least 85 different cannabinoids have been isolated from the plant.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis#:~:text=There%20are%20483%20identifiable%20chemical%20constituents%20known%20to%20exist%20in%20the%20cannabis%20plant%2C%5B52%5D%20and%20at%20least%2085%20different%20cannabinoids%20have%20been%20isolated%20from%20the%20plant.
HiGrade only mention this test method used by industry.
https://www.gethigrade.com/science.php#:~:text=However%2C%20today%E2%80%99s%20testing,secondary%20to%20that.
There are several analytical approaches frequently used in the industry to test potency including gas chromatography (GC),
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).
Gas chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography are the most commonly used and are coupled with a variety of detectors such as mass spectrometry (MS),
Ultra Violet (UV) or triple quadrupolar mass spectrometry (QQQ-MS.)
https://www.caro.ca/the-science-behi...ed%20to%20them!
To make thing worse, some industrial test labs have been falsifying test results!
I am deeply shocked! It's totally unacceptable, from now on I'll just rely on... guess...
Me myself madwoman and I!
Did I get high or not? If not, what did I do wrong in the cultivation, was it a bad seed seller, was it bad seeds, wrong genetics, strain, bad nutritions etc...
If I got high the way I wanted, let's do it again again again...
It is based on a camera accessory (HiGrade Scope, a kind of camera loupe) that you attach to your iPhone or Android.
You take a picture which is then uploaded to a service that analyzes the picture with an algorithm based on other pictures uploaded by other users, pictures which are archived somewhere.
An image taken with a digital camera is based on pixels, rectangular or square, resolution, and color, RGB, CMYK.
So, I did some research, and... when things seem too good to be true, they probably are...
Until I see an independent testing lab do a comparison test of the same marijuana plant, I remain skeptical. (I was born skeptical.)
Just my my 2¢...
There are 483 identifiable chemical constituents known to exist in the cannabis plant, and at least 85 different cannabinoids have been isolated from the plant.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis#:~:text=There%20are%20483%20identifiable%20chemical%20constituents%20known%20to%20exist%20in%20the%20cannabis%20plant%2C%5B52%5D%20and%20at%20least%2085%20different%20cannabinoids%20have%20been%20isolated%20from%20the%20plant.
HiGrade only mention this test method used by industry.
https://www.gethigrade.com/science.php#:~:text=However%2C%20today%E2%80%99s%20testing,secondary%20to%20that.
There are several analytical approaches frequently used in the industry to test potency including gas chromatography (GC),
high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).
Gas chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography are the most commonly used and are coupled with a variety of detectors such as mass spectrometry (MS),
Ultra Violet (UV) or triple quadrupolar mass spectrometry (QQQ-MS.)
https://www.caro.ca/the-science-behi...ed%20to%20them!
To make thing worse, some industrial test labs have been falsifying test results!
I am deeply shocked! It's totally unacceptable, from now on I'll just rely on... guess...
Me myself madwoman and I!
Did I get high or not? If not, what did I do wrong in the cultivation, was it a bad seed seller, was it bad seeds, wrong genetics, strain, bad nutritions etc...
If I got high the way I wanted, let's do it again again again...
Last edited: