My little diamond decarbing experiment, and Cheetah Piss dabs, got me thinking.
When squares, normies, and talking heads talk about weed, they say it contains the psychoactive THC. Now, that isn't quite right, is it? Unless there has been some sort of natural decarbing going on, there is no THC in weed. There is THC-A.
Is it not more accurate to say weed contains the not-psychoactive THC-A and produces THC?
When squares, normies, and talking heads talk about weed, they say it contains the psychoactive THC. Now, that isn't quite right, is it? Unless there has been some sort of natural decarbing going on, there is no THC in weed. There is THC-A.
Is it not more accurate to say weed contains the not-psychoactive THC-A and produces THC?
Comment