PeterMatanzas
New member
In a metaphorical sense.
This guy runs a cannabis related company and he claims he can, and his customers can, determine the potency of cannabis oil by viewing its color!! This is in his company's product documentation I kid you not. I told him in a public discussion forum he has no scientific evidence to backup his claim and he went nuclear level ballistic.
I have some ridiculous questions. Should I use a Pantone color chart? Should I view under daylight or neon or candlelight?
The depth of the oil, how thick it is while drying on a silicon mat, will also affect the reflection of light so you must ensure the thickness of every sample is the same, right? You have to pour the oil for each sample exactly the same onto the drying mat. Not too thin not too thick just the same for every sample !!
This guy makes fun of lab analysis, says it's not reliable, and he says do this instead. He says *THIS* is reliable. What a joke.
A chemist would say he is using a qualitative observation to state a quantitative conclusion. This is not reproducible and it has no scientific rigor. This is not only misinformation it is potentially dangerous. If you sell an edible and state the THC is 100mg and it's not, that's fraud.
This guy runs a cannabis related company and he claims he can, and his customers can, determine the potency of cannabis oil by viewing its color!! This is in his company's product documentation I kid you not. I told him in a public discussion forum he has no scientific evidence to backup his claim and he went nuclear level ballistic.
I have some ridiculous questions. Should I use a Pantone color chart? Should I view under daylight or neon or candlelight?
The depth of the oil, how thick it is while drying on a silicon mat, will also affect the reflection of light so you must ensure the thickness of every sample is the same, right? You have to pour the oil for each sample exactly the same onto the drying mat. Not too thin not too thick just the same for every sample !!
This guy makes fun of lab analysis, says it's not reliable, and he says do this instead. He says *THIS* is reliable. What a joke.
A chemist would say he is using a qualitative observation to state a quantitative conclusion. This is not reproducible and it has no scientific rigor. This is not only misinformation it is potentially dangerous. If you sell an edible and state the THC is 100mg and it's not, that's fraud.
