100g dry coco heavily loaded with 0.85-2.36mm particle size with very litte fine particles absorbs water 7 time of its weight, reaching 1.4L when it is saturated
Isnt 7 times 100g 0.7 litres ?? As water weight is 1/1 with volume.
(So Water holding Capacity of this media is 50%. Good to know that 75-50% of this WHC is plant unavailable water; PUW).
Yes, so from memory the water availability to plants is determined by the difference in field capacity and the wilting point. Can you provide data that shows this characteristic of coco coir ?
Lets say Cation Exchange Capacity of this media is 50 meq and Anion Exchange Capacity is 0. Potassium, Sodium, Calcium and magnesium in the CEC are 45%, 15%, 0 and 0 respectively. The solution i use for veg has the composition of 5 meq/l Calcium(100PPM), 3 meq/l Magnesium and 2.0 meq/l Potassium. So total cations are 10.0 meq/l. If i use this solution to hydrate dry coco, Cations start to exchange but No cation can exchange without reaching the surface of the particles of the media. So this equilibrium needs time specially at lower "temperatures and concentrations".
You say that cations start to exchange with hydration but no cations can exchange without reaching the surface of the particles of the media. This is not making sense to me and sounds a little contradicting. Care to elaborate ? Are you suggesting that cations initially start to exchange, but takes time for the cations to interact with exchange sites. Does this time factor have anything to do with the water potential through the media? Or is it simply the characteristics of adsorption.
At the beginning there are 3.5meq Calcium, 2.1 meq Magnesium and 1.4 meq Potassium in 0.7L water that our sample can hold.
You now say 0.7L so i assume it was just a error.
These are 7.0 meq cations. Here cation exchange sites can hold (1 - 7.0/57) of the total specific cation in the volume. This means 12.2% of tottal specific cation within the volume will be remain in the solution and the rest will be positioned in the CEC sites. If we do some mathematics we get 3.5, 2.1, 23.9 and 7.5 meq Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium and Sodium respectively in the volume and 12.2% of these are 0.43, 0.26, 2.94, 0.92+ 2.4 meq of the other cations, including Hydrogen ion, that remain in the solution.
Yes i seem to understand you here.
Although we started with dry coco(hydrated coco contains water so it can't hold all of 0.7L) and higher Ca ratio in solutions compare to solutions formulated for low CEC substrate, these numbers and simple model show that chemical properties of the unbuffered coco needs to be fixed before planting unless we have a nutrient solution composition that formulated to work at that circumstances.
Yes, i assume the nutrient solution for the circumstances you speak of where coco is unbuffered, would be that where the feeding solution compensates for the cations lost to the coco. So in other words, you not only feed your plants, but also your media (coco) as it would take its share of the available nutrients (mostly calmag due to their higher affinity with cation sites).
Any change in solution composition effects CEC sites. These changes in CEC sites need time depending on both temperature and concentration as i said.
So the quantity of solution used can change the time that cations take to adhere ?. What formula or data can you provide that shows how long a certain application would take. For what reasons do these factors have an effect on time.
24H sounds enough even at 20°C and concentrations as low as several times of that is used for feeding plants But the EC is not the correct quantity to know whether it's enough to shift Cations ratio within the media or not. You have to look at the number of cation moles you have in the solution not just EC.
So are you saying that the quantity of cation sites (which can be calculated by the volume of coco), dictates how much nutrient solution is needed for appropriate buffering. And also that the EC is not a ideal quantifier. As just as you previously stated, a single drop can be 400EC. But you need to calculate by quantity of cations within a solution and not by concentration (quantity vs concentration basically).
Overall i believe i understand what you are saying. And i must thank you for taking the time to do that in such a way that made sense. Hopefully you can extend on this with the further questions i have provided. I am very excited ^.^