What's new
GrowWeedEasy.com
You're browsing as a guest. Sign up to join the conversation, share your grows, and get help from thousands of fellow growers — it's free and takes less than a minute.

Beyond Ordinary, A Journey With Rare Genetics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Subpar strains we've gotten cozy with reminded me of my blanket made out of recycled soda bottles. Soda bottles are comfy as hell!
 
I wonder if this unhinged troll considers Mazar a sativa. Using botanical terms from the 18th century to describe a plants physical shape is supposed to be some kind of redemption. Another flat ball.
 
Retreat into fantasy land? Look deeper into your left crystal ball, your psychic powers of remote viewing are failing again.
 
Dhyan...just FYI, on this forum that 'at' symbol followed by their 'handle' is a polite or pointed way, whichever the case may be, to acknowledge someone. So, thank you for checking out some of my previous posts on other threads and liking them. I'm trying to learn, so I am on here a lot.

Where do you grow your weed? Do you grow your weed indoors or out? What is your preferred grow method and medium? How long have you been growing weed? Is it legal wherever you live? What equipment do you use?

I have learned that the grow environment is the most critical element growing weed. Improper lighting and improper ranges of nutrients, PH, heat, and RH will make superior quality genetics produce sub par weed. Do I have science for that? No, but so what? (smile). All of the education and knowledge in the world will never grow weed. As someone on the forum has said, anybody can grow sub par weed, it takes some skill and patience to grow great weed. And yes, great weed can be grown regardless of what one may think of the plant's specific genetics.

Show us what ya got. Let's see your stuff.
 
Last edited:
"He" doesn't get anything, its a bot. The charts and graphs are meaningless nonsense, as are the ideas promoted, the sentence syntax has blatant multiple errors in them, and the arguments are circular hyperbole . Many words, nothing meaningful has been said. If there is a human element to this poster they are being an a**hole for the fun of it. Look at the response to my question in post 37. Not my assertion. But a study was conducted... Blah, blah, blah. meaningless.
 
Last edited:
And I hope you get the real thing, golfnrl . And I hope you have a chance to grow one of those monsters outside!
Knowing what we know about terp and canna- production in different media and nutrients would you still do coco?
 
Yes, I would do coco. At least initially, after I had a run or two with it outdoors I may change my mind, depending on the outcome.
 
When I win that lottery I keep talking about, I'm going to have different rooms with different setups to grow a single strain. Hi-bay lights. Museum RH machines. Leprechaun security. The works!
Growing outside gives me the willies. Too many bugs. Maybe a class-10 clean room of a green house.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top