Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This might explain why THC alone doesn't always indicate true strength.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    This might explain why THC alone doesn't always indicate true strength.

    I found this article a few days ago on the Seedsman blog: https://blog.seedsman.com/theres-a-c...nger-than-thc/

    I'd love to know where some of my favorites such as Purple Haze and Acapulco Gold score in THCP content. They never seem to test much better than 20% THC yet their apparent strength is greater than that.
    Coconut Grove
    4x4 tent, Platinum LED P4-XML2, four Patio Pickers. Vegging Liberty Haze, Acapulco Gold, Lavender and Sweet Amnesia Haze.

    3x3 tent, Platinum P300 LED. Flowering two Tangies.

    Flower tent:
    4x4 tent, Platinum LED P4-XML2, four Patio Pickers. Vegging Super Lemon Haze, Durban Poison and two Tangie x Blueberry crosses.

    Nursery:
    32"x32" tent with Feit white LED. Vegging four Mother's Finest.

    Coco/Perlite/worm castings/mycorrhizae living soil mix.
    Down-To-Earth dry amendments. Gnarly Barley added weekly. Eisenia fetida.

    On deck: Winter indicas.

    #2
    I read about this in High Times back at the beginning of the year. I'm no chemist but it is a fascinating read despite most of it flying well over my head. I've been intrigued about how the chemical components in cannabis can have such widely varying effects on people. I can remember a friend once giving me some sample of his grow and it was some of the most impressive looking, tasting, smelling, product I had personally ever seen. Problem was it just didn't get you high. It was huge glistening, sweet sticky bud, but almost worthless. It will be very interesting where this leads in the future.

    Comment

    Check out our new growing community forum! (still in beta)

    Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter!

    Working...
    X